2011
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved element design for 64‐channel planar imaging

Abstract: Investigation of highly accelerated MRI has developed into a lively corner in the hardware and methodology arena in recent years. At the extreme of (one-dimensional) acceleration, our group introduced Single Echo Acquisition (SEA) imaging, in which the need to phase encode a 64×Nreadout image is eliminated and replaced with the well-localized spatial information obtained from an array of 64 very narrow, long, parallel coils. The narrow coil width (2mm) that facilitates this is accompanied by a concomitant cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the gradients account for as little as 10% of the encoding; the rest of the burden being placed on the receive array. While the “ultimate” g-factor theory tells us there are limits to the ability of arrays to encode, primarily from the fundamental smoothness of solutions to Maxwell’s equations as you penetrate deeply into the object [34,35,37], planar 64-channel arrays in the very near field show that there is virtually no limit to using the spatial information of the arrays to encode [9698]. Figure 12 shows a high resolution (1mm × 1mm × 2mm) spin echo EPI brain image acquired with a 96-channel array at accelerations of R =4,5,6, and 8×, demonstrating the ability of the array to achieve its expected acceleration in one dimension ( R ~6), which is relatively near the expected limit of 1-D acceleration.…”
Section: Experience With Massively Parallel Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the gradients account for as little as 10% of the encoding; the rest of the burden being placed on the receive array. While the “ultimate” g-factor theory tells us there are limits to the ability of arrays to encode, primarily from the fundamental smoothness of solutions to Maxwell’s equations as you penetrate deeply into the object [34,35,37], planar 64-channel arrays in the very near field show that there is virtually no limit to using the spatial information of the arrays to encode [9698]. Figure 12 shows a high resolution (1mm × 1mm × 2mm) spin echo EPI brain image acquired with a 96-channel array at accelerations of R =4,5,6, and 8×, demonstrating the ability of the array to achieve its expected acceleration in one dimension ( R ~6), which is relatively near the expected limit of 1-D acceleration.…”
Section: Experience With Massively Parallel Arraysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In choosing an appropriate element design, loop elements, dual plane pair elements [8], and a rung element were considered. The array was intended to be used in a transmit/receive configuration, using the add-on eight channel prototype transmit system and the existing GE eightchannel receiver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%