2023
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2023.3259204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved FCS-MPC Strategy for Low-Frequency Oscillation Stabilization of PV-Based Microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, have been taken into consideration. The comparison results of A-phase current simulation among the traditional VOC with PI controller in [7], the table-based DPC in [8], the FCS-MPC in [18], and the proposed switching control are illustrated in Figure 5. From Figure 5, we learn that the performance of the traditional 3, have been taken into consideration.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3, have been taken into consideration. The comparison results of A-phase current simulation among the traditional VOC with PI controller in [7], the table-based DPC in [8], the FCS-MPC in [18], and the proposed switching control are illustrated in Figure 5. From Figure 5, we learn that the performance of the traditional 3, have been taken into consideration.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Figure 5, we learn that the performance of the traditional 3, have been taken into consideration. The comparison results of A-phase current simulation among the traditional VOC with PI controller in [7], the table-based DPC in [8], the FCS-MPC in [18], and the proposed switching control are illustrated in Figure 5. From Figure 5, we learn that the performance of the traditional VOC method in [7] is inevitably degraded due to its inaccurate decoupled item in controller under circuit parameters uncertainty.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations