2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2004.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved formulation for scheduling an automated wet-etch station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not clear, if a satisfactory resolution of this issue is possible. Though it is certainly beyond the scope of this work, we strongly believe that this critical issue, in addition to those mentioned by Karimi et al,51 must be taken care of in any numerical evaluation of MILP models. In our numerical evaluation, we have eliminated the effect of this factor.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not clear, if a satisfactory resolution of this issue is possible. Though it is certainly beyond the scope of this work, we strongly believe that this critical issue, in addition to those mentioned by Karimi et al,51 must be taken care of in any numerical evaluation of MILP models. In our numerical evaluation, we have eliminated the effect of this factor.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A fair and an unbiased comparison demands careful attention on many factors51 such as hardware, operating system, and software. In our study, we used CPLEX 11/GAMS52 22.8 on a Dell precision PWS690 workstation with Intel® Xeon® 3 GHz CPU, 16 GB RAM, running Windows XP Professional x64 Edition.…”
Section: Numerical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fair, well‐planned, extensive, and comprehensive procedure is essential49 for a reliable assessment of MILP models based on a numerical study. To achieve a solid comparison, we solve the three test problems (Examples 1, 2a, and 2b) for several numbers of partitions and several sets of grid‐point positions.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhushan and Karimi (2003) also adopt a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) approach to generate optimal schedules at a wet station; based on the MILP approach, a two-step heuristic approach is developed. A reformulation of their MILP model is available (Karimi, Tan, and Bhushan 2004). A MILP approach was also recently used by Aguirre, Méndez, and Castro (2011) to model the wet station scheduling problem with several robots; the model proved more efficient than the one developed by Bhushan and Karimi (2003) for solving medium-sized problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%