2012 4th IEEE RAS &Amp; EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2012.6290814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved human-robot interface by measurement of muscle stiffness

Abstract: Human contact with haptic devices introduces instabilities due to human operators' attemps to stiffen their arm to stabilize the system. Controllers often cannot measure arm stiffness and do not typically account for this. A method to effectively adjust the controller of a robotic force assist device to compensate for changes in operator arm stiffness was established. It was expected to achieve reduced oscillations and increased performance than one with fixed gains. The results could be used to design human-r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each antagonistic pair of muscles ( ), processed EMG values (f i , f j ) are scaled to respective maximum recorded EMG values (f i max , f j max ) to obtain normalized muscle activity (f i % , f j % ) values between 0 and 1. Cocontraction cc i, j of a muscle pair is determined by taking the minimum normalized muscle activity at each sample time [16,19,31], as shown in (8).…”
Section: B Model Selection Methodology and Simulation Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each antagonistic pair of muscles ( ), processed EMG values (f i , f j ) are scaled to respective maximum recorded EMG values (f i max , f j max ) to obtain normalized muscle activity (f i % , f j % ) values between 0 and 1. Cocontraction cc i, j of a muscle pair is determined by taking the minimum normalized muscle activity at each sample time [16,19,31], as shown in (8).…”
Section: B Model Selection Methodology and Simulation Usingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. (7) displays the co-contraction index, cc i, j , a measure of muscle co-contraction determined by taking the minimum normalized muscle activity for a muscle pair at each sample time (Gallagher et al, 2012;Gribble et al, 2003;Thoroughman & Shadmehr, 1999). , ( ) = min( % ( ), % ( )) All measurements acquired (endpoint force, endpoint kinematics, and four EMG measurements) and directly computed variables during these experimental trials were subsequently used as simulation inputs, in order to compare and evaluate different prediction tools.…”
Section: Quasi-static Stiffness Measurement Through Perturbation Expementioning
confidence: 99%