2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0373463319000535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved ICCP Matching Algorithm for use in an Interference Environment during Geomagnetic Navigation

Abstract: The Iterated Closest Contour Point (ICCP) algorithm is widely used in geomagnetic navigation. In order to enhance the anti-interference performance of the ICCP, an improved algorithm is proposed. First, the principle of delta modulation is introduced to generate a geomagnetic matching sequence according to the magnetic fluctuations, this assists finding the optimal quantitative step and matching length; thus, the algorithm's accuracy and real-time performance are improved. Second, in order to solve the problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Earth's magnetic field is the inherent physical field of the Earth [1,2]. It has crucial applications in geomagnetic navigation [3,4], attitude calculation [5][6][7], magnetic anomaly signal detection [8,9], and so on. The error of geomagnetic data will not accumulate over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Earth's magnetic field is the inherent physical field of the Earth [1,2]. It has crucial applications in geomagnetic navigation [3,4], attitude calculation [5][6][7], magnetic anomaly signal detection [8,9], and so on. The error of geomagnetic data will not accumulate over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravity matching algorithms [9,10] are the critical part of gravity aided INS navigation, and mainly consist of TERCOM [11], ICCP (iterative closest contour point), SITAN (sandia inertial terrain aided navigation) and their variants. In comparison, TERCOM has been extensively studied by scholars, resulting from its insensitivity to initial error, simple calculation mechanism, high positioning accuracy and strong robustness [12,13]. However, its mismatching occurrence in the matching processing will seriously affect the calibration effect of INS system parameters [14,15], and even lead to the failure of underwater sailing mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geomagnetic navigation technology can provide a reliable navigation method by measuring geomagnetic fields for mobile robots, such as underwater vehicle navigation (AUV) (Kinsey et al, 2006 ) and unmanned aircraft (UA) (Yuan et al, 2011 ; Kebria et al, 2020 ). Conventional geomagnetic navigation methods mainly focus on geomagnetic matching algorithms, which mainly include the Mean Absolute Difference algorithm (MAD) (Caifa et al, 2011 ), Mean Square Difference algorithm (MSD) (Rong, 2016 ), and Iterative Closest Contour Point algorithm (ICCP) (Lin et al, 2007 ; Xiao et al, 2019 ; Luo et al, 2021a ). However, the conventional matching methods mainly depend on a priori geomagnetic map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%