2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved Internet-based melanoma screening system with dermatologist-like tumor area extraction algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
135
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scheme is Wavelet Transformation for image improvement, denoisingand Histogram analysis and finally fuzzy interference system for final decision of skin type based. Combination of ABCD rule and wavelet coefficient shown classification accuracy by 60%.Hitoshi Iyatomi et al [7] proposed an internet based melanoma screeing system which involves area extraction algorithm which calculates characterization of the tumor. The sensitivity achieves is 85.9% and Specificity is 86%.Nagaraj et al [8] have proposed a technique called automatic segmentation of skin lesion in traditional macroscopic images.…”
Section: Complete Life Cycle Of An Automated System For the Detecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed scheme is Wavelet Transformation for image improvement, denoisingand Histogram analysis and finally fuzzy interference system for final decision of skin type based. Combination of ABCD rule and wavelet coefficient shown classification accuracy by 60%.Hitoshi Iyatomi et al [7] proposed an internet based melanoma screeing system which involves area extraction algorithm which calculates characterization of the tumor. The sensitivity achieves is 85.9% and Specificity is 86%.Nagaraj et al [8] have proposed a technique called automatic segmentation of skin lesion in traditional macroscopic images.…”
Section: Complete Life Cycle Of An Automated System For the Detecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iyatomi et al [25] built the site in 2004, which is still in operation. They acquired and analyzed 1,258 dermoscopic images via the site, and achieved high sensitivity and speci city of 85.9% and 86.0%, respectively [26]. First, their system extracts the melanoma area from the image using image analysis methods such as thresholding and clustering.…”
Section: Diagnostic Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [40] a service on the Internet was introduced to upload dermoscopy images for on-line extraction of the tumor area and calculation of 428 global features (color, symmetry, border, and texture ABCD) for the characterization of the lesion. The extracted features classified the lesion as melanoma or nevus using a neural network classifier achieving a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 86.0% on a set of 1258 dermoscopy images using cross-validation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%