2015
DOI: 10.17577/ijertv4is120280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved K-Means Clustering Method for Liver Segmentation

Abstract: Determining liver accurately from CT scans is the primary and crucial step for an automated liver segmentation. The knowledge of the liver structure, liver surface and liver volume is required for liver segmentation. The boundaries of the various organs are nor clearly visible as a result of complex structure of the human body. This paper proposes an ant colony based k-means method which reduces the initial clusters problem of k-means clustering method. In this proposed method level set methods have also been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the year of 2015 Dr.S.S.Dhenakaran, N.Roobini [1], have proposed a Comparative Analysis of K-means Algorithm in Disease Prediction to analyze the various whereas Harsha Pakhale, Deepak Kumar Xaxa [2], have surveyed many data mining techniques that have used for classification of liver patients. The authors [3], used the improved the K-means clustering for liver segmentation by making it less dependent on the initial parameters such as randomly chosen initial cluster centers and hence more stable.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the year of 2015 Dr.S.S.Dhenakaran, N.Roobini [1], have proposed a Comparative Analysis of K-means Algorithm in Disease Prediction to analyze the various whereas Harsha Pakhale, Deepak Kumar Xaxa [2], have surveyed many data mining techniques that have used for classification of liver patients. The authors [3], used the improved the K-means clustering for liver segmentation by making it less dependent on the initial parameters such as randomly chosen initial cluster centers and hence more stable.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%