2011 Second International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icndc.2011.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Lexicographical Sort Algorithm of Copy-move Forgery Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the r matching blocks Jie Hu developed a method distance of Eigen vectors instead of DCT coeffi the block [8]. Yang Wang, Kaitlyn Gurule, Ja Jun Zhengpropose a wavelet based copy m detection and applied multi-level 2D DWT, si approach gives significant results for perceivin forgery [9].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the r matching blocks Jie Hu developed a method distance of Eigen vectors instead of DCT coeffi the block [8]. Yang Wang, Kaitlyn Gurule, Ja Jun Zhengpropose a wavelet based copy m detection and applied multi-level 2D DWT, si approach gives significant results for perceivin forgery [9].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, codebooks can be designed to offer robustness against stream symbol reception errors. For instance, the lexicographical distance between words can be maximized [16], to limit the probability that an erroneously received word will be treated as another valid one. Model checking techniques can study the effects of such events [17], subsequently proposing protocol revisions as needed.…”
Section: A Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forensic methods should detect duplicated regions even when the copied regions have experienced geometrical distortions such as rotation or scaling. To test the ability of the proposed method to detect copy-move forgery in the presence of such geometrical distortions, we rotated copied regions in test dataset by 2,4,6,8,10,20,60,88,90,92,176,178, and 180 degrees. We assumed this is a reasonable range for practical tampering and scenarios.…”
Section: Rotation and Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%