1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.717858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved magnetic equivalent circuit method for predicting the characteristics of highly saturated electromagnetic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finite-Element Method (FEM) (Arkadan and Kielagas, 1994), Magnetic Equivalent Circuit (MEC) method (Moallem and Dawson, 1998) and piecewise linear model (Miller and Mcglip, 1990) are reported for the analysis of SRM. In this study analytical method described is used to determine the inductance and average torque of the machine.…”
Section: Calculation Of Average Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite-Element Method (FEM) (Arkadan and Kielagas, 1994), Magnetic Equivalent Circuit (MEC) method (Moallem and Dawson, 1998) and piecewise linear model (Miller and Mcglip, 1990) are reported for the analysis of SRM. In this study analytical method described is used to determine the inductance and average torque of the machine.…”
Section: Calculation Of Average Torquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By way of examples, Laplacian or quasi-Poissonian field equations were directly solved analytically for SPM machines [10], [11] and inset PM machines [12], conformal mapping techniques were used for analyzing the influence of stator slotting [13]- [15] and rotor saliency in IPM machines [16], [17], while lumped magnetic circuit methods [3]- [9], [18]- [26] were extensively used for SPM machines [18]- [20], switched reluctance machines [21], linear brushless dc machines [22], hybrid stepping motors [5], salient-pole synchronous machines [23], flux-switching PM machines [24]- [26], inset PM machines [6], IPM machines [3], [4], [7]- [9], etc. In the lumped magnetic circuit analysis, the permeances of stator yoke and rotor yoke were often omitted for simplicity [5]- [7], [9], [18], [22], [25], [26], or handled with the nonlinear B-H curve of iron by iterative process for higher accuracy [3], [4], [8], [19]- [21], [23], [24]. However, since there is no significant magnetic saturation at yokes, neglecting the permeances of stator yoke and rotor yoke is usually acceptable and the results will still have fair accuracy [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since there is no significant magnetic saturation at yokes, neglecting the permeances of stator yoke and rotor yoke is usually acceptable and the results will still have fair accuracy [27]. To account for the slotting effect, [3], [6], [7] introduced Carter coefficient for predicting the average air-gap flux density, and [4], [5], [18], [20], [21], [24]- [26] analytically approximated the flux distributions in the slots by assuming straight and semicircular lines for predicting air-gap flux density distribution. However, the stator slots can be neglected if only the average air-gap flux density is considered [8], [9], [19], [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moallem used the flux pattern of highly saturated electromagnetic device obtained from FE analysis to modify MEC for more accurate results [3]. Chang tried to explore the synergistic interaction of FE efficiency and accuracy [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%