2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-013-1183-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved memetic algorithm using ring neighborhood topology for constrained optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To balance the exploration and exploitation, an adaptive memetic DE was proposed (Piotrowski 2013), where the ring topology was used to construct the neighborhood of individuals for local model. In Hu et al (2014), the ring neighborhood topology was employed to improve a memetic DE algorithm. Recently, several population topologies, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To balance the exploration and exploitation, an adaptive memetic DE was proposed (Piotrowski 2013), where the ring topology was used to construct the neighborhood of individuals for local model. In Hu et al (2014), the ring neighborhood topology was employed to improve a memetic DE algorithm. Recently, several population topologies, e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A weak trade-off between exploration and exploitation and limitation of population diversity are two major challenges in PSO [14] and work has been done to address them in terms of parameter setting, neighborhood topology, learning approaches, and hybridized methods [15]. For example, some works tried to fine tune and regulate the parameters through memory adaptation [16], [17], Gaussian adaptation [18], or fuzzy-based methods [19], while other works attempted to avoid premature convergence by utilizing a neighborhood strategy like fully informed [20], self-adaptive [21] or ring topology [22], or a combination strategy through L茅vy distribution such as LFPSO [23] and PSOLF [24]. The No Free Lunch (NFL) theorem asserts that no optimization methods can defeat all optimizers in solving all problems [25], [26], which motivated us to further extend PSO in order to better avoid local minimum and create a more balanced trade-off between exploration and exploitation in training MLP ANNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve CMOPs, constraint-handling mechanisms are important. In recent years, many different constraint-handling mechanisms have been proposed [15,16]. According to [17], constraint-handling techniques can be generally classified into (1) penalty functions; (2) special representations and operators; (3) repair algorithms; (4) separate objectives and constraints; and (5) hybrid methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%