2013
DOI: 10.1177/0148607113483178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Method for Collecting Breath From 3‐ to 7‐Year‐Old Children

Abstract: Breath sampling and analysis provide healthcare professionals with a practical, noninvasive diagnostic measurement for children with a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. New biomarkers found in human breath have been investigated and provide the opportunity to diagnose bacterial overgrowth and other underlying causes of GI dysfunction. Although several protocols have been described previously regarding breath sampling, few have demonstrated the feasibility of collection in young children. This communi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction for improper collection may be important, particularly in children in whom the quality of sample collection may vary (24). Young age, anxiety, and fear associated with medical visits may be factors affecting proper sampling (12). On the other hand, the commitment and experience of technicians involved may render correction for incorrect sampling unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Correction for improper collection may be important, particularly in children in whom the quality of sample collection may vary (24). Young age, anxiety, and fear associated with medical visits may be factors affecting proper sampling (12). On the other hand, the commitment and experience of technicians involved may render correction for incorrect sampling unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… the breath test was considered positive when the exhaled methane exceeded the following net increments over baseline: ≥12 ppm [based on the manufacturer's recommendation (12)] ≥10 ppm [representing the most frequently used cut‐off in the literature and based on international recommendations (2)] ≥5 ppm (to mirror a ≥20 ppm increase in net hydrogen exhalation based on the chemical reaction that 2 hydrogen molecules [4 hydrogen elements] are consumed to produce 1 methane molecule)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation