1999
DOI: 10.1063/1.371601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved model for ultraviolet- and x-ray-induced electron emission from CsI

Abstract: A microscopic theoretical model is proposed for calculating the characteristics of ultraviolet photoemission and x-ray secondary electron emission induced from CsI photoconverters. This approach is based on a realistic picture of the basic interactions of photons and induced electrons within the material. Both differential and integral emission characteristics, such as energy spectra and quantum efficiencies, are estimated according to the model and are found to agree, in general, with experimental data. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One such compound is the simple ionic salt CsI. This material is a testing ground both for new ideas about compressed matter and new techniques for photoconverters [3]. The metallization in CsI was experimentally achieved by Vohra et al [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such compound is the simple ionic salt CsI. This material is a testing ground both for new ideas about compressed matter and new techniques for photoconverters [3]. The metallization in CsI was experimentally achieved by Vohra et al [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher initial QE enhancement for CsI/Cu(100) might be related to the lower electron affinity (0.1-0.2 eV) compared with CsBr (0.4 eV). [13][14][15] It may also imply that the surface Cu band structure is more compressed for CsI than CsBr. 16 We obtain very significant QE enhancement from CsI/Cu(100), following laser activation, that is far greater than that observed for CsBr/Cu(100).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations of elastic scattering amplitudes can be done reasonably well in the muffin-tin potential approximation [3][4][5]. In contrast, a fully rigorous method for including inelastic scattering has not yet been published.The main aim of this paper is to provide a more accurate description of secondary electron emission rates in solids than the currently existing models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. This is important for a better understanding of radiation damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%