2006
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/4/1/006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved nearly analytical discrete method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2-D porous structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b) shows the desired circularly symmetric wave front. For method (1), the numerical dispersion and source-generated noises caused by the discretizing the wave equations with too-coarse grids in the finite difference implementation can be suppressed by using some damage-control techniques such as a flux-corrected transport technique (Yang et al 2002) or a nearly analytical discrete method (Yang et al 2007). But in this paper, we simply chose method (2) for all future implementations.…”
Section: Seismic Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b) shows the desired circularly symmetric wave front. For method (1), the numerical dispersion and source-generated noises caused by the discretizing the wave equations with too-coarse grids in the finite difference implementation can be suppressed by using some damage-control techniques such as a flux-corrected transport technique (Yang et al 2002) or a nearly analytical discrete method (Yang et al 2007). But in this paper, we simply chose method (2) for all future implementations.…”
Section: Seismic Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach uses a truncated Taylor expansion with respect to time to analytically approximate the wave displacement and its gradients at grid points, while the high-order space derivatives involved in these truncated Taylor formulae are determined through using some interpolation relations based on the functions of the truncated Taylor expansion with respect to spatial increments. Based on the same idea, several versions have been developed, including the nearly analytic discrete method (NADM), the optimal nearly analytic discrete method (ONADM) (Yang et al, 2006), Runge-Kutta method using high-order interpolation approximation (Yang et al, 2007a) for solving 2D acoustic and elastic wave equations, and the improved nearly analytical discrete method (INADM) for 2D porous elastic wave equations (Yang et al, 2007b). Numerical results of these schemes illustrate that the NADM-based approaches can effectively suppress numerical dispersions caused by the discretization of the wave equations when too-coarse grids are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it enables effectively to suppress the numerical dispersion. However, the NADM has only second‐order time accuracy (Yang et al 2007). To increase the accuracy of the NADM and save the space storage for computer code, the so‐called the optimal NADM (ONADM) for solving acoustic‐ and elastic‐wave equations for the single‐phase medium case was also suggested by Yang et al (2004, 2006), however the ONADM cannot be applied to the two‐phase porous wave equations including the so‐called velocity ∂U/∂t of the wave displacement U because the ONADM does not compute the velocity‐fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%