2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved non-reflecting outlet boundary condition for weakly-compressible SPH

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the phases differ slightly according to the resolution and numerical scheme. However, the Strouhal number (italicSt$$ St $$) obtained from the averaged frequencies (f$$ f $$) are consistent with one another and the reference solutions 29,36–46 …”
Section: Benchmark Simulationssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases, the phases differ slightly according to the resolution and numerical scheme. However, the Strouhal number (italicSt$$ St $$) obtained from the averaged frequencies (f$$ f $$) are consistent with one another and the reference solutions 29,36–46 …”
Section: Benchmark Simulationssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, the Strouhal number (St) obtained from the averaged frequencies (f ) are consistent with one another and the reference solutions. 29,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]…”
Section: D Vortex Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the outlet boundary condition we use the hybrid outlet condition of Negi et al [29], where we extrapolate the characteristic variables, referred to as J 1 , J 2 , and J 3 in aforementioned article, of the fluid onto the outlet particles and add them to the time-averaged value of the corresponding property. For the inlet we use a similar method, where the characteristics are evaluated as done in Lastiwka et al [30].…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary treatment has been the main focus and difficulty of the SPH method, which affects the accuracy and precision of the calculation. Many different approaches have been proposed in the literature to enforce the solid boundary conditions to prevent particle penetration [31][32][33]. The proposal of a generalized wall boundary condition is an alternative to the dynamic boundary conditions, which can be applied in complex geometries [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%