2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2899650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Position Determination Algorithm Based on Nonlinear Compensation for Ground-Based Positioning Systems

Abstract: In the absence of GNSS or when signals from satellites are blocked in harsh environments, a ground-based positioning system can be used to estimate the position of users and receivers. Nevertheless, ground-based systems suffer dramatic nonlinear error resulting from the linearization used in typical positioning algorithms. Robust positioning algorithms that are capable of handling strong nonlinearity cases are therefore of great value. In this paper, we propose an algorithm termed promoted iterative least-squa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the figures, the proposed NRD-WSDF algorithm can estimate the targets successfully with fewer array elements, and the estimation accuracy becomes higher with the increase of array elements. is section compares the RMSE performance of different algorithms with different SNRs under different σ 2 error .…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the figures, the proposed NRD-WSDF algorithm can estimate the targets successfully with fewer array elements, and the estimation accuracy becomes higher with the increase of array elements. is section compares the RMSE performance of different algorithms with different SNRs under different σ 2 error .…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is section compares the RMSE performance of different algorithms with different snapshots under different σ 2 error . e number of snapshots changed from 10 to 460. e estimation is simulated when σ 2 error is 2 (Figure 11) and 50 (Figure 12).…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, since the pseudolite constellation is fixed, there are no ephemeris errors and relativistic effects. Therefore, the indoor single-frequency pseudolite DD observation equations can be formulated as [33][34][35], ∇∆P ks br = ∇∆ρ ks br + ∇∆e P + ∇∆M P ∇∆L ks br = λ 1 ∇∆ϕ ks br = ∇∆ρ ks br + ∇∆ε L + ∇∆m L + λ 1 ∇∆N ks br (1) where ∇∆ is a DD operator; r and b represent the rover and base stations, respectively. k and s represent pseudolites.…”
Section: Observation Model In Pseudolite Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%