2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved rapid method for DNA recovery from cotton swabs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that swabs are useful for collecting DNA and/or bacteria from the lesion area, but poor at releasing the DNA on extraction procedure. Moreover, DNA extraction methods can affect the yield of DNA amount (Adamowicz et al 2014, Gray et al 2023. Therefore, false negative PCR results due to the extraction method might have caused discrepancies in detection rates of the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that swabs are useful for collecting DNA and/or bacteria from the lesion area, but poor at releasing the DNA on extraction procedure. Moreover, DNA extraction methods can affect the yield of DNA amount (Adamowicz et al 2014, Gray et al 2023. Therefore, false negative PCR results due to the extraction method might have caused discrepancies in detection rates of the bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swabs in this experiment were extracted using our in-house extraction protocol as described by Gray et al [ 52 ] as preliminary experiments showed this method maximised DNA recovery over the available commercial methods. Briefly, swabs were extracted using a polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/tween 20 solution containing proteinase K followed by a heating step to kill proteinase K activity and then direct qPCR of the extract.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSA gave the best results but cannot be used in combination with prot K as it destroys the BSA. Therefore, PVP was used instead of BSA, ending up with the following optimal buffer composition: 1% PVP, 1% Tween 20, and 20 mM Tris HCl (with 20 µg/mL prot K to remove proteins that are bound to the DNA preventing access for primers and polymerase) [33].…”
Section: Comparison Of Swab Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%