2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-017-2859-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Semidefinite Programming Hierarchy for Testing Entanglement

Abstract: We present a stronger version of the Doherty-Parrilo-Spedalieri (DPS) hierarchy of approximations for the set of separable states. Unlike DPS, our hierarchy converges exactly at a finite number of rounds for any fixed input dimension. This yields an algorithm for separability testing which is singly exponential in dimension and polylogarithmic in accuracy. Our analysis makes use of tools from algebraic geometry, but our algorithm is elementary and differs from DPS only by one simple additional collection of co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of no-signalling codes is also studied in [42]. Semidefinite programming [50] is a subfield of convex optimization and is a powerful tool in quantum information theory with many applications (e.g., [23,28,37,42,[51][52][53][54][55][56]). There are known polynomial-time algorithms for semidefinite programming [57].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of no-signalling codes is also studied in [42]. Semidefinite programming [50] is a subfield of convex optimization and is a powerful tool in quantum information theory with many applications (e.g., [23,28,37,42,[51][52][53][54][55][56]). There are known polynomial-time algorithms for semidefinite programming [57].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The no-signalling codes is also studied in [27]. Semidefinite programming [35] is a subfield of convex optimization and is a powerful tool in quantum information theory with many applications (e.g., [15], [22], [27], [28], [36], [37], [38], [39]). In this work, we use CVX [40] and QETLAB [41] to solve the SDPs in this work.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed the only previously known unconditional negative result was in the original DPS paper which showed that the error always remained nonzero for all finite values of k (see also [BS10] showing that this could be amplified). Indeed one can even define an improved version of DPS that removes this limitation and always exactly converges at a finite (but large) value of k [HNW15].…”
Section: Dps Hierarchy For Separability Problem and Integrality Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%