1961
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8659(1961)90[225:aisbfs]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Stream Bottom Fauna Sampler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On each occasion 3 replicate samples were taken with a 0.1 m 2 modified Hess sampler (Waters & Knapp 1961) fitted with a 0.5-mm-mesh nylon net. The samples were taken at depths of 0.25-0.40 m, which usually were located about 30% across each riffle sampled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each occasion 3 replicate samples were taken with a 0.1 m 2 modified Hess sampler (Waters & Knapp 1961) fitted with a 0.5-mm-mesh nylon net. The samples were taken at depths of 0.25-0.40 m, which usually were located about 30% across each riffle sampled.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This curve development relies upon standard techniques for benthic macroinvertebrate sampling. Using a circular bottom sampler (Waters and Knapp, 1961), Surber sampler (Surber, 1937), or other area-defining samplers, measurements of depth, mean water column velocity, and substrate characteristics are recorded for a series of samples (we suggest between 25 and 50 samples) taken at random along transects across a 'typical' stream reach. In most cases, riffle samples are used since these organisms are the most likely to be impacted by decreased flows (usually the management alternative being examined).…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Habitat Suitability Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benthic samples were collected using a Waters & Knapp (1961) sampler with an area of 0.1 m 2 and fitted with a 350 |im mesh net.…”
Section: Sampling Equipment and Laboratory Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%