2010 IEEE 12th International Conference on Communication Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icct.2010.5688617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved TOPSIS vertical handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the choice space is a u × v matrix, where u is the number of candidate schemes, i.e., u = 2, and v is the number of candidate power allocation factors, which are discretized artificially. The concrete implementation process is as follows: first, the standard deviation method [20], which uses mathematical variance information to solve the MADM problem, is used to obtain the objective weight of each decision parameter; then, the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) [21], which makes the most of the information of the raw data, is used to sort the candidate combinations in order to choose the best one.…”
Section: Adaptive Power Allocation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the choice space is a u × v matrix, where u is the number of candidate schemes, i.e., u = 2, and v is the number of candidate power allocation factors, which are discretized artificially. The concrete implementation process is as follows: first, the standard deviation method [20], which uses mathematical variance information to solve the MADM problem, is used to obtain the objective weight of each decision parameter; then, the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) [21], which makes the most of the information of the raw data, is used to sort the candidate combinations in order to choose the best one.…”
Section: Adaptive Power Allocation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular classical MADM methods are: SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) [6] [18]: the overall score of a candidate network is determined by the weighted sum of all the attribute values. TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) [7]: the chosen candidate network is the one which is the closest to ideal solution and the farthest from the worst case solution. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) [8]: decomposes the network selection problem into several sub-problems and assigns a weight value for each sub-problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their algorithm gives better sensing performance and better throughput in CR networks. Sheng-Mei et al (2010), they combine signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). This approach proves to be an effective mathematical tool for problems that need to make decisions.…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movements of the nodes can generate creations and/or loss of links. Lahby et al (2013) and Sheng-Mei et al (2010) propose a decision technique for vertical handover based on the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) algorithm. In Lahby et al (2013), they combine multi-criteria decision methods, analytical network processes and the improved TOPSIS algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%