2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0204-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved upper-bound pushover procedure for seismic assessment of high-rise moment resisting steel frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in the case of Model-14 when the intensity of ground motion is 50%, the value of γ may be taken as larger than 1/2 for the conservative prediction of the maximum member force. It is interesting to note that Rahmani et al had reached a similar conclusion in their research, that the contribution of the second mode should be factored by 0.5 for the improvement of accuracy in upper stories, in their improved upper-bound pushover analysis for the traditional moment-resisting frame structures [30].…”
Section: Simultaneity Of the Peak Modal Responsementioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, as shown in the case of Model-14 when the intensity of ground motion is 50%, the value of γ may be taken as larger than 1/2 for the conservative prediction of the maximum member force. It is interesting to note that Rahmani et al had reached a similar conclusion in their research, that the contribution of the second mode should be factored by 0.5 for the improvement of accuracy in upper stories, in their improved upper-bound pushover analysis for the traditional moment-resisting frame structures [30].…”
Section: Simultaneity Of the Peak Modal Responsementioning
confidence: 67%
“…To overcome the shortcoming of the UB pushover analysis, Rahmani et al (Rahmani et al 2018) proposed a new version of the UB method called the improved UB pushover analysis. In this version, the authors adjusted the contribution of the second mode of vibration in the load pattern formula using a correction factor 𝐶 𝑟 .…”
Section: Iub Lateral Load Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the target displacement is considered equal to the mean of the roof displacements calculated by the NTHA, which makes the two multi-run procedures difficult to be applied in practice. Later, Rahmani et al (Rahmani et al 2018) proposed the so-called improved upper bound (IUB) pushover analysis. The IUB procedure adjusts the contribution of the second mode of vibration in both the lateral load pattern and the target displacement formulas using a correction factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with 𝐤 = 𝐔 𝑇 𝐊𝐔 and the corresponding back-substitutions, instead of performing the same operations with the full model matrix in Equation (15). In this way, a significant part of the computational cost for these global operations, hard to parallelize in a computer code, is avoided, while the internal forces accounting for the material nonlinearity is accurately evaluated at the full model scale with element-by-element operations easy to implement in parallelized form.…”
Section: The Reduced Order Model For a MD Of Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved modal pushover analysis [ 14 ] is another evolution of nonlinear static analysis based on a multi‐mode approach which allows to redefine the lateral loads in order to realize the in‐elastic deformed shape. The case of high‐rise buildings was further investigated by Rahmani et al., [ 15 ] who proposed the improved upper bound pushover analysis. It consists in adjustment of lateral loads to improve accuracy in evaluating the seismic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%