2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-021-02176-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved whale optimization algorithm-based radial neural network for multi-grade brain tumor classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objective of this study is to illustrate the explainability capabilities of our proposed NeuroXAI framework for assisting clinicians, not to obtain the best classification results only. However, the applied classifier achieved a superior accuracy of 98.62%, comparing to the state-of-the-art methods [ 8 , 13 16 ] as given in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main objective of this study is to illustrate the explainability capabilities of our proposed NeuroXAI framework for assisting clinicians, not to obtain the best classification results only. However, the applied classifier achieved a superior accuracy of 98.62%, comparing to the state-of-the-art methods [ 8 , 13 16 ] as given in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the applied classifier achieved a superior accuracy of 98.62%, comparing to the state-of-the-art methods [ 8 , 13 16 ] as given in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This table clearly reveals the superiority of the introduced scheme based on segmentation accuracy. The existing methods which are compared with the proposed method are: HCNNs, 40 Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm‐Based Radial Neural Network, 42 RepOptimizer, 41 Exponentially Weighted Pelican Chimp Optimization‐based Shepard, 43 U‐Net, 19 transformer‐enhanced convolutional neural network (TECNN), 44 ResUNet++, 45 JGate‐Attention based ResUNet, 46 UNet, 47 self‐supervised learning (SSL), 48 ResUNet Segmentation (ResUNet‐SEG), 49 HDNN, 50 MHKFC 51 and DenseUNet+ 52 . The accuracy percentages ranged from 79.9% (U‐Net‐based models) to 96.75% (TECNN) for the BraTS 2018 dataset and the introduced method attained segmentation accuracy of 97.5%.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dixit and Nanda 79 proposed multigrade brain tumor classification using an improved whale optimization algorithm (IWOA) and radial basis neural network (RBNN). At first, the preprocessing of MRI images is initiated, and then FCM clustering‐based segmentation is employed for tumor area identification.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithms For Disease Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%