2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-022-09452-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improvement on the Charge Transfer Property of CuInS2/CdS Quantum Dot-Sensitized Solar Cells by a Two-Step Assembly Linking Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein, ZnO orderly nanoarrays and CuInS 2 QDs are intrinsic n‐type semiconductors, and NiO is intrinsic p‐type semiconductor. [ 30,50,54 ] With the formation of NiO/CuInS 2 QDs/ZnO pn junction, the potential has been reconstituted. Corrected by Ag/AgCl, the Fermi levels of ZnO (CB‐ZnO, vs NHE) shift from −0.110 to 0.085 V, the Fermi levels of CuInS 2 QDs (CB‐CuInS 2 QDs, vs NHE) shift form −0.332 to −0.189 V, and the Fermi levels of NiO (VB‐NiO, vs NHE) shift from 0.462 to 1.404 V. By the intrinsic bandgaps (Figure S1, Supporting Information), the VB of ZnO and CuInS 2 QDs are 3.166 V (vs NHE) and 2.155 V (vs NHE), the CB of NiO is −2.107 V (vs NHE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Herein, ZnO orderly nanoarrays and CuInS 2 QDs are intrinsic n‐type semiconductors, and NiO is intrinsic p‐type semiconductor. [ 30,50,54 ] With the formation of NiO/CuInS 2 QDs/ZnO pn junction, the potential has been reconstituted. Corrected by Ag/AgCl, the Fermi levels of ZnO (CB‐ZnO, vs NHE) shift from −0.110 to 0.085 V, the Fermi levels of CuInS 2 QDs (CB‐CuInS 2 QDs, vs NHE) shift form −0.332 to −0.189 V, and the Fermi levels of NiO (VB‐NiO, vs NHE) shift from 0.462 to 1.404 V. By the intrinsic bandgaps (Figure S1, Supporting Information), the VB of ZnO and CuInS 2 QDs are 3.166 V (vs NHE) and 2.155 V (vs NHE), the CB of NiO is −2.107 V (vs NHE).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 44 ] Herein, the transition layer modification has attracted lots of attentions, because which can decrease the potential gradient to regulate potential structure, [ 45,46 ] while accelerating charge carrier transportation via interface modification. Especially the CuInS 2 quantum dots, [ 47,48 ] besides depended on itself size, the bandgap, and potential can also be regulated by the ratio of Cu/In, which can provide more larger range for matching the pn junction potential gradient, such as Li and groups have used CuInS 2 nanocrystals to improve the photoresponse, [ 49 ] Peng and groups have improved the charge transfer property of solar cells via CuInS 2 /CdS QDs, [ 50 ] and so on. Additionally, the presence of Cu vacancy would induce the Ni injection to increase the Ni vacancy, [ 51,52 ] which can increase the Ni 3+ ions to increase p‐type conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CdSe/CdS co-sensitized configuration has shown to be an excellent light absorber for QDSSCs due to their heterojunction potential, thus facilitating electron transport [17,18]. Specifically, the CdS layer can act as a seed layer for CdSe growth and create an energy barrier to suppress charge recombination [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%