2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50026-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improvement to Chvátal and Thomassen’s Upper Bound for Oriented Diameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kwok, Liu and West [5] proved that 9 ≤ ḡ(3) ≤ 11. Together with Vaka, we showed that ḡ(4) ≤ 21 [6]. The major effort in the same paper for us was to show that ḡ(d) ≤ 1.373d 2 + 6.971d − 1.…”
Section: Further Literaturementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Kwok, Liu and West [5] proved that 9 ≤ ḡ(3) ≤ 11. Together with Vaka, we showed that ḡ(4) ≤ 21 [6]. The major effort in the same paper for us was to show that ḡ(d) ≤ 1.373d 2 + 6.971d − 1.…”
Section: Further Literaturementioning
confidence: 79%
“…and constructed bridgeless graphs of diameter d for which every strong orientation admits a diameter of at least 1 2 d 2 + d. The upper bound was improved by Babu, Benson, Rajendraprasad and Vaka [1] to 1.373d 2 + 6.971d − 1.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bound in Theorem 1 is not sharp; an improvement of this bound was given by Babu et al [1]. Because it is very difficult to determine stackreltruediam(G), researchers have tried to obtain sharp upper bounds for some special classes of graphs, such as complete k‐partite graphs, or to establish tight upper bounds in terms of other graph parameters, such as the domination number, minimum degree, maximum degree, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%