2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63924-2_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In-depth Analysis of OCR Errors for Unconstrained Vietnamese Handwriting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following our study [47] on the VNOnDB-OCR dataset, the errors with edit distances 1 and 2 contribute more than 80% of the total errors whereas the ones with the edit distance 1 account for over 60%. In addition, it is shown in [48] that the edit distances of 1 and 2 obtain better correction results instead of higher edit distances.…”
Section: ) Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following our study [47] on the VNOnDB-OCR dataset, the errors with edit distances 1 and 2 contribute more than 80% of the total errors whereas the ones with the edit distance 1 account for over 60%. In addition, it is shown in [48] that the edit distances of 1 and 2 obtain better correction results instead of higher edit distances.…”
Section: ) Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the same VNOnDB-OCR dataset, our study [47] provided the error rates at the syllable level and character level as shown in Table 2. We can see that the error rates in the test dataset (4.7% and 13.6% at the character level and syllable level, respectively) are much higher than those in the combined training and validation dataset (1.7% and 4.3%).…”
Section: A Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations