2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02748-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in-field evaluation of rapid DNA instruments for disaster victim identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few publications compared the RapidHIT and the ANDE systems. The RapidHIT ID System and the ANDE 6C Rapid DNA System were compared by Watherston et al for DVI simulations [ 55 ]. Moreover, Romsos et al tested the ANDE and the RapidHIT (both the RapidHIT 200 and the RapidHIT ID) with sets of blinded single-source reference samples [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A few publications compared the RapidHIT and the ANDE systems. The RapidHIT ID System and the ANDE 6C Rapid DNA System were compared by Watherston et al for DVI simulations [ 55 ]. Moreover, Romsos et al tested the ANDE and the RapidHIT (both the RapidHIT 200 and the RapidHIT ID) with sets of blinded single-source reference samples [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, both systems were suitable for identification at the (crime) scene. While the ANDE 6C system is more robust in terms of resistance to shocks upon transport (to a crime scene), the RapidHIT can generate more DNA profiles that are usable [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some attempts to extend the range of sample types to low quantities of DNA or mixtures have been published with various levels of success (see Table 4 ). Researcher and practitioners from Australia [ [40] , [41] , [42] ], Canada [ 43 ], China [ 44 ], Italy [ 45 ], Japan [ 46 , 47 ], and the United States [ [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] ] have contributed to an increased understanding of rapid DNA testing capabilities and limitations.…”
Section: Advancements In Current Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%