2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in silico validation framework for quantitative DCE-MRI techniques based on a dynamic digital phantom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limitation to extending to 3D is the characterization of the angiogenic sprouts by endothelial cells that make up both sides (in 2D) of the sprout. This can be overcome by describing the vessels as nodes (which describe the radius of the vessel) connected by edges (which describe the directionality of the vessels), an approach taken by [ 70 , 71 ]. Another key modeling limitation is the use the maximum likelihood values from Scenarios 1 and 2, as opposed to Bayesian inference in Scenarios 3–5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation to extending to 3D is the characterization of the angiogenic sprouts by endothelial cells that make up both sides (in 2D) of the sprout. This can be overcome by describing the vessels as nodes (which describe the radius of the vessel) connected by edges (which describe the directionality of the vessels), an approach taken by [ 70 , 71 ]. Another key modeling limitation is the use the maximum likelihood values from Scenarios 1 and 2, as opposed to Bayesian inference in Scenarios 3–5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As out of plane effects could play a significant role in vessel sprouting, future efforts will be focused on extending the formalism to The main limitation to extending to 3D is the characterization of the angiogenic sprouts by cells that make up both sides (in 2D) of the sprout. This can be overcome by describing the vessels as nodes (which describe the radius of the vessel) connected by edges (which describe the directionality of the vessels), an approach taken by [65,66]. In our future work, we aim to utilize more experimental replicates to further calibrate and validate our model and to devise experimental protocols with anti-angiogenic and radiation therapies to model the effects of these treatments on angiogenic sprouts in vitro [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key advantage of digital phantoms is their capability to represent complex shapes and material properties for populations rather than specific individuals [91][92][93]. Moreover, in contrast with ex vivo medical imaging, digital phantoms are not subject to tissue shrinkage, deformation, or any physical changes caused by invasive or post-mortem procedures [94]. They are analogous to instrument models generated through computer-aided design in that they can be converted directly into sparse patient models or voxelized into volumetric models and in that their suitability for a given simulation depends on the features included and the level of detail.…”
Section: Instrument and Patient Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%