2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in-situ data based model to downscale radiometric satellite soil moisture products in the Upper Hunter Region of NSW, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1 km and 3 km SMAP SM products are obtained by disaggregating the coarse-resolution SMAP TB or SM data using Sentinel-1 SAR data; however, a trade-off is observed between the finer spatial resolution and noise associated with SAR data [25]. Overall, reducing the uncertainty caused by complex surface scattering conditions on vegetation and surface roughness is critical for SM downscaling methods depending on active microwaves [25,27].Some downscaling methods based on fine-resolution optical/infrared data mainly use triangular/trapezoidal feature space (non-linear fitting methods with VIs and LST [15,[36][37][38][39], Peng's methods [40,41], the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) method [42]), the soil evaporation process (evaporative fraction (EF), soil evaporative efficiency (SEE), disaggregation based on physical and theoretical scale change (DisPATCh) [43-45])), and thermal inertia theory [46]. In the downscaling process, a SM proxy variable is usually used to construct the relationship model with SM such as Peng's methods [40,41], UCLA, EF, SEE, and DisPATCh.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 km and 3 km SMAP SM products are obtained by disaggregating the coarse-resolution SMAP TB or SM data using Sentinel-1 SAR data; however, a trade-off is observed between the finer spatial resolution and noise associated with SAR data [25]. Overall, reducing the uncertainty caused by complex surface scattering conditions on vegetation and surface roughness is critical for SM downscaling methods depending on active microwaves [25,27].Some downscaling methods based on fine-resolution optical/infrared data mainly use triangular/trapezoidal feature space (non-linear fitting methods with VIs and LST [15,[36][37][38][39], Peng's methods [40,41], the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) method [42]), the soil evaporation process (evaporative fraction (EF), soil evaporative efficiency (SEE), disaggregation based on physical and theoretical scale change (DisPATCh) [43-45])), and thermal inertia theory [46]. In the downscaling process, a SM proxy variable is usually used to construct the relationship model with SM such as Peng's methods [40,41], UCLA, EF, SEE, and DisPATCh.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, μSM shows an inverse relationship with ΔT. This relationship was used in the studies carried out by Fang et al (2013), Fang and Lakshmi (2014), Senanayake et al (2017Senanayake et al ( , 2018Senanayake et al ( and 2019 to build the regression models to disaggregate coarse resolution satellite soil moisture products. However, this relationship is modulated by a number of factors such as vegetation density, soil texture, topography, daily mean temperature, etc., affecting the linearity of the regression model.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This area was instrumented for measuring soil moisture and soil temperature along with other auxiliary data from 2002 under the Scaling and Assimilation of Soil Moisture and Streamflow (SASMAS) project (Rüdiger et al 2003 and. Therefore, the area has been evaluated for soil moisture variability by a number of research studies (Martinez et al 2007;Chen et al 2014;Senanayake et al 2017Senanayake et al , 2018Senanayake et al , 2019. This includes a high resolution airborne campaign, National Airborne Field Experiment 2005 (NAFE'05) (Panciera et al 2008), which was conducted on 4 consecutive Mondays, (31 st October, 7 th , 14 th and 21 st November 2005) over a 40 × 40 km land area covering Krui and Merriwa River catchments using an L-band radiometer (Panciera et al 2008).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given correlations between SM and geoformation data, topography is also generally used as ancillary information within the downscaling approaches (Peng et al, 2017). Long‐term dense in situ SM observations allow training regression models to generate finer resolution SM retrievals; however, operational application of these empirical polynomial fitting methods is hampered by requirements of extensive in situ SM observations (Abbaszadeh et al, 2019; Senanayake et al, 2019; Zhao et al, 2018). Optimizing land surface model (LSM) variables to provide fine‐scale SM estimations for the overlapping coarse resolution pixels is also proposed to downscale L‐band SM observations; yet differences in climatology between remote sensing and LSM SM estimates limit their applicability (Fang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%