2017
DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_117_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In vitro comparison of coconut water, milk, and saline in maintaining periodontal ligament cell viability

Abstract: Background and Objectives:Two of the most critical factors affecting the prognosis of an avulsed tooth after replantation are extraoral dry time and the storage media in which the tooth is placed before treatment is rendered. The present study is undertaken to evaluate the periodontal ligament (PDL) cell viability after storage of teeth in different storage media, namely, coconut water, milk, and saline.Materials and Methods:Forty sound human premolars undergoing extraction for orthodontic purpose were selecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Storage techniques showing less benefit compared with milk on the preservation of tooth or cell viability are summarized in Table 3. Firstly, a meta‐analysis of six comparisons from three RCTs and two non‐RCTs involving 104 extracted teeth showed that the cell viability rate was significantly lower in extracted teeth stored in saline solutions for 30 to 120 minutes compared with those stored in milk (pooled SMD −4.35, 95% CI [−7.55;−1.14], P = .008) (Figure 2, comparison 1.1.4) 43,45–48 . The heterogeneity across the trials was substantial (non‐overlapping CIs, I 2 = 94%, and Chi 2 test P < .0001), and one study, Sunil et al, 47 showed that the teeth stored in saline solution had significantly higher cell viability rates compared with teeth stored in milk (SMD 3.81, 95% CI [2.00;5.62], P < .0001), in contrast to all other studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Storage techniques showing less benefit compared with milk on the preservation of tooth or cell viability are summarized in Table 3. Firstly, a meta‐analysis of six comparisons from three RCTs and two non‐RCTs involving 104 extracted teeth showed that the cell viability rate was significantly lower in extracted teeth stored in saline solutions for 30 to 120 minutes compared with those stored in milk (pooled SMD −4.35, 95% CI [−7.55;−1.14], P = .008) (Figure 2, comparison 1.1.4) 43,45–48 . The heterogeneity across the trials was substantial (non‐overlapping CIs, I 2 = 94%, and Chi 2 test P < .0001), and one study, Sunil et al, 47 showed that the teeth stored in saline solution had significantly higher cell viability rates compared with teeth stored in milk (SMD 3.81, 95% CI [2.00;5.62], P < .0001), in contrast to all other studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of coconut water for storing extracted teeth also suffers from conflicting evidence originating from four RCTs including 96 extracted teeth. Three RCTs showed improved cell viability rates after storing extracted teeth for 45 minutes in coconut water compared with milk, 45,47,53 while the fourth RCT showed lower cell viability rates following storage in coconut water for 45 minutes 50 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the critical outcome of viability, as measured by the number or percentage of viable PDL cells, we identified very low-certainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision) from 3 RCTs demonstrating harm from immersion in buttermilk, 263 castor oil, 255 and turmeric extract. 264 (downgraded for risk of bias, inconsistency between trials, indirectness, and imprecision) from 6 RCTs 243,247,253,259,263,265,271 showing inconsistent evidence of benefit of coconut water and aloe vera when compared with milk. Furthermore, very low-certainty evidence (downgraded for risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision) from 6 RCTs that did not demonstrate a benefit for viability from immersion in egg white, 244,248,259,271 epigallocatechin-3-gallate, 245 or neem extract (an evergreen tree extract) 264 compared with milk.…”
Section: Media Demonstrating Benefit Compared With Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 31 full texts to further verify their eligibility. After evaluating the full texts, 11 studies were excluded due to six reasons: ineligible topic (n = 5), no full text available (n = 1), duplicate records (n = 2), ineligible media (n = 1), ineligible outcome (n = 1), and inadequate data (n = 1), and then 20 eligible studies (6,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) including 31 reports were considered to be eligible for our inclusion criteria. The identification and selection of studies were Figure 1.…”
Section: Identification and Selection Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 20 included studies, only three studies (31,38,39) definitively reported the methods of generating random sequence, none of the studies (6,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41) reported the details of performing allocation concealment, and all studies were rated as low risk of bias in incomplete data, selective reporting, and other bias domains. Overall, the level of risk of bias among all studies was considered to be moderate.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%