2018
DOI: 10.1111/pan.13366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro evaluation of the influence of neonatal endotracheal tube diameter and length on the work of breathing

Abstract: In our infant lung model, a shorter tube resulted in a lower work of breathing and lower ventilator-generated peak inspiratory pressure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Clinicians frequently use PS to try to reduce the work of the breathing imposed on the baby by breathing through a narrow endotracheal tube. 6,7 In a randomized trial, infants ventilated with SIMV-PS required fewer days of mechanical ventilation than babies receiving SIMV only. 8 When using pressure-controlled SIMV-PS without VG, the relationship between the peak inflating pressure of SIMV inflations (PIP) and of pressure-supported spontaneous breaths (PIP PS = PEEP + PS) is constant and is determined by user settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 Clinicians frequently use PS to try to reduce the work of the breathing imposed on the baby by breathing through a narrow endotracheal tube. 6,7 In a randomized trial, infants ventilated with SIMV-PS required fewer days of mechanical ventilation than babies receiving SIMV only. 8 When using pressure-controlled SIMV-PS without VG, the relationship between the peak inflating pressure of SIMV inflations (PIP) and of pressure-supported spontaneous breaths (PIP PS = PEEP + PS) is constant and is determined by user settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PS converts spontaneous breaths into pressure‐limited inflations; their inspiratory time (Ti) is variable because they are flow‐cycled rather than time‐cycled 3 . Clinicians frequently use PS to try to reduce the work of the breathing imposed on the baby by breathing through a narrow endotracheal tube 6,7 . In a randomized trial, infants ventilated with SIMV‐PS required fewer days of mechanical ventilation than babies receiving SIMV only 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%