1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00062-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro investigation of a poly (vinyl phosphonic acid) based cement with four conventional glass-ionomer cements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study reported that the hardness of contemporary glass ionomers was not adversely affected by early exposure to water. 24 Leirskar and others found that early access to water increased the strength of a high strength auto-cured cement. 12 In this study, the authors found that early water contact did not positively or negatively influence the shear strength of glass ionomers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A previous study reported that the hardness of contemporary glass ionomers was not adversely affected by early exposure to water. 24 Leirskar and others found that early access to water increased the strength of a high strength auto-cured cement. 12 In this study, the authors found that early water contact did not positively or negatively influence the shear strength of glass ionomers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…on the cement properties. 23,25,26 As glass-ionomer cement is susceptible to humidity, it is recommended that its surface be coated during the initial curing phase, that is, soon after loosing its surface brightness. 10,18 However, glass-ionomer cements have a slow curing process and during this phase, they are susceptible to saliva and water attacks, which dissolve such materials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, non‐destructive ultrasonic testing was applied to monitor the setting processes of glass–ionomer cements, based on the relationship between the ultrasonic velocities and the elastic constants described by a micromechanical model (21). Unlike the surface‐hardness‐measurement method (22), the ultrasound approach does not define the setting reaction as the time point when the cement reaches a specific strength; rather, it monitors the viscoelastic properties of the materials. At the beginning of the ultrasonic measurement, the longitudinal velocity in the cement mix could not be detected for FI, FL, and KC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%