1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199812)26:6<405::aid-ppul5>3.0.co;2-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro validation of a commercially available metabolic cart using pediatric ventilator volumes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gas exchange method derives VO 2 and VCO 2 from the difference in absolute amounts of oxygen and CO 2 in inspired and exhaled gas using standard formulas (12). The metabolic cart has been validated in the pediatric patient (13,14) and in neonates (15).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The gas exchange method derives VO 2 and VCO 2 from the difference in absolute amounts of oxygen and CO 2 in inspired and exhaled gas using standard formulas (12). The metabolic cart has been validated in the pediatric patient (13,14) and in neonates (15).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…First, the size of the airway is smaller, around 4 mm of diameter and any minimum edema may cause severe obstructive symptoms 7 . Moreover, the trachea has less cartilaginous tissue than in adults, generating greater airway instability, increasing respiratory effort and, consequently, higher oxygen consumption 8 . Therefore, our group modified the technique by Tsang and Grillo 3,4 and placed a silicone Y tracheobronchial stent in a few selected patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean error was 0.6 0.3 % for _ VO 2 detection and 1.8 0.3 % for _ VCO 2 detection during simulation of gas exchange expected in infants ranging from 0.5 to 10 kg body weight [13]. An in vitro validation of the SensorMedics 2900 Metabolic Cart (SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, Calif.), using neonatal respirator settings as in the present study, found small measurement errors for _ VO 2 , _ VCO 2 and RQ at tidal volumes above 100 ml at a ventilator frequency of 20/min [14]. However, at tidal volumes of 100 ml the error increased and tidal volumes of 50 ml resulted in unacceptable errors ranging from ±13.2 to ±21.3 % of predicted values.…”
Section: Discussion Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%