2018
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, its diagnostic ability for VRF is not sufficient, particularly in root-filled teeth where imaging artifacts from radio-dense obturating materials impair diagnostic accuracy [18][19][20]. CBCT may also be useful for detection of osseous changes associated with a VRF [24], although its accuracy for detection of buccal cortical bone defects requires attention because it may overestimate their presence [25,26]. This appears to be the first study to have confirmed the empirical notion that sinus tracts are formed closer to the gingival margin in teeth with a VRF, in contrast to failed root canal treatment where sinus tracts are often located more apically [9,12,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its diagnostic ability for VRF is not sufficient, particularly in root-filled teeth where imaging artifacts from radio-dense obturating materials impair diagnostic accuracy [18][19][20]. CBCT may also be useful for detection of osseous changes associated with a VRF [24], although its accuracy for detection of buccal cortical bone defects requires attention because it may overestimate their presence [25,26]. This appears to be the first study to have confirmed the empirical notion that sinus tracts are formed closer to the gingival margin in teeth with a VRF, in contrast to failed root canal treatment where sinus tracts are often located more apically [9,12,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] Alveolar bone with a thickness less than 0.3 mm may wrongly be diagnosed as ABD 28 and still be overestimated in a false-positive result in very thin bony plate regions. 28 Peterson et al 30 also reported an increase in the prevalence of ABD when measured using CBCTs as compared with clinical measurements. On the other hand, it is necessary to analyze the cost-benefit balance based on the principles of ALARA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It has been suggested that, although CBCT has significant diagnostic applications in periodontics, conventional radiography can better depict bone quality, periodontal ligament space, and bone levels; accordingly, the decision to use CBCT imaging should only be made after careful consideration of its potential risks and benefits. In addition, differences in imaging protocol parameters can affect the reproducibility and reliability of CBCT used for the measurement of alveolar bone height and thickness 2829. Peterson et al29 concluded that CBCT underestimated alveolar bone height; mean facial bone height on CBCT images ranged from 0.33±0.78 mm to 0.88±1.14 mm, which was less than the absolute bone height of 0.56±0.35 mm to 1.08±0.92 mm.…”
Section: Applications Of Cbct In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, differences in imaging protocol parameters can affect the reproducibility and reliability of CBCT used for the measurement of alveolar bone height and thickness 2829. Peterson et al29 concluded that CBCT underestimated alveolar bone height; mean facial bone height on CBCT images ranged from 0.33±0.78 mm to 0.88±1.14 mm, which was less than the absolute bone height of 0.56±0.35 mm to 1.08±0.92 mm.…”
Section: Applications Of Cbct In Dentistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation