Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate, ex vivo, the precision of
five electronic root canal length measurement devices (ERCLMDs) with different
operating systems: the Root ZX, Mini Apex Locator, Propex II, iPex, and RomiApex
A-15, and the possible influence of the positioning of the instrument tips short
of the apical foramen.Material and Methods:Forty-two mandibular bicuspids had their real canal lengths (RL) previously
determined. Electronic measurements were performed 1.0 mm short of the apical
foramen (-1.0), followed by measurements at the apical foramen (0.0). The data
resulting from the comparison of the ERCLMD measurements and the RL were evaluated
by the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests at a significance level of 5%.Results:Considering the measurements performed at 0.0 and -1.0, the precision rates for
the ERCLMDs were: 73.5% and 47.1% (Root ZX), 73.5% and 55.9% (Mini Apex Locator),
67.6% and 41.1% (Propex II), 61.7% and 44.1% (iPex), and 79.4% and 44.1% (RomiApex
A-15), respectively, considering ±0.5 mm of tolerance. Regarding the mean
discrepancies, no differences were observed at 0.0; however, in the measurements
at -1.0, the iPex, a multi-frequency ERCLMD, had significantly more discrepant
readings short of the apical foramen than the other devices, except for the Propex
II, which had intermediate results. When the ERCLMDs measurements at -1.0 were
compared with those at 0.0, the Propex II, iPex and RomiApex A-15 presented
significantly higher discrepancies in their readings.Conclusions:Under the conditions of the present study, all the ERCLMDs provided acceptable
measurements at the 0.0 position. However, at the -1.0 position, the ERCLMDs had a
lower precision, with statistically significant differences for the Propex II,
iPex, and RomiApex A-15.