2012
DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2012.704197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Indecent Proposal: The Theological Core of the Book of Ruth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, there’s a consensus that Naomi’s scheme goes beyond the accepted norms and puts Ruth in a compromising situation. I agree with Charles Halston (2012) that it was an ‘indecent proposal’ on the part of Naomi. 17 Why does Ruth this time seem so obedient as compared to the road to Bethlehem?…”
Section: Audacity and Integrity As Pathway To Resiliencementioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, there’s a consensus that Naomi’s scheme goes beyond the accepted norms and puts Ruth in a compromising situation. I agree with Charles Halston (2012) that it was an ‘indecent proposal’ on the part of Naomi. 17 Why does Ruth this time seem so obedient as compared to the road to Bethlehem?…”
Section: Audacity and Integrity As Pathway To Resiliencementioning
confidence: 59%
“… 17. Halton C (2012) An indecent proposal: the theological core of the book of Ruth. SJOT: Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 26(1): 30–43. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27.1-11 with Zelophehad’s daughters (2016). Halton draws out the provocative overtones and ambiguity in Ruth 3, making a case that Naomi uses Ruth for sexual entrapment (2012). Agriculture is another key motif, as illustrated by Britt (2004), Koosed (2016), and Snow (2017).…”
Section: Commentaries and Monographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24.4). Halton heightens the sexual nature and vulnerability of this scene when he writes that it is ‘centered around sexual entrapment using Ruth as bait’ (2012: 32). Frymer-Kensky adds that there are only two possibilities in this scene, either ‘she is uncovering him, or herself’ and the ambiguity may be an intentional ploy by the narrator ‘by not making the scene absolutely clear’ (2002: 248).…”
Section: Emerging Areas Of Emphasis In Ruth Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%