2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An indentation model for erosive wear in Al2O3/SiC nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Table 3 AO13Al ceramics have the highest fracture toughness, while AO25Al has the worst one. It is worth mentioning that the data on the material loss from this work is in the good agreement with that from [14], where at 4,9 N load and 22,5 m spacing the volume of 23, 5 ⋅ 10 3 m 3 is chipped away from the surface of alumina ceramics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Table 3 AO13Al ceramics have the highest fracture toughness, while AO25Al has the worst one. It is worth mentioning that the data on the material loss from this work is in the good agreement with that from [14], where at 4,9 N load and 22,5 m spacing the volume of 23, 5 ⋅ 10 3 m 3 is chipped away from the surface of alumina ceramics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Figure 2 presents the change of the surface with the variation of array spacing parameters: (a, c)-elastic-plastic deformation and (b)-additional material lost. Relating to [14] the impression volume was taken into account. That is why the decrease of the spacing from 50 down to 0 m led to three characteristic stages of the qualitative change of the macrodamage of the surface: (V 1 )-the array, consisting of 9 separate indents (in some cases there were cracks, stretching from the corners of the indent) (Figure 2(a)); (V 2 )-chipping of the material due to the intersection of the cracks and/or the internal stress regions (Figure 2(b)); (V 3 )-a single impression, after the consequent penetration of the indenter for 9 times on the same point of the surface (Figure 2(c)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this approach may be related to materials’ lower hardness due to residual porosity and occurred flaws dealt with nanotubes agglomeration at ceramic processing 212 . An addition of SiC grains promoted the toughening of alumina ceramics and their erosion resistance, specifically changing from intergranular fracture for monophase ceramics to transgranular fracture for the composites 213–215 . However, again these materials’ processing requires firing in controlled atmosphere.…”
Section: Features Of Erosion Of Advanced Ceramics and Coatings And Ro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample with 0.8 wt% Tb 4 O 7 sintered at 1625°C exhibited the best performance, with the relative density of 95.70% and the abrasion rate of 0.103. IP Shapiro and others formed nanocomposites by adding submicrometer‐sized SiC particles in an alumina matrix, and found that the ceramic wear resistance increased and its fracture mode changed from intergranular fracture to intergranular fracture. Subsequently, Yahya and Todd discovered the same fracture mode as SiC‐doped alumina ceramics by continuously exploring the wear behavior of alumina ceramics doped with small amounts of C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%