An index to characterize female career promotion in academic medicine

Abstract

BackgroundImbalances in female career promotion are a key factor of gender disparities at the workplace. They may lead to stress and stress-related diseases including burnout, depression or cardiovascular diseases. Since this problem cannot be generalized and varies between different fields, new approaches are needed to assess and describe the magnitude of the problem in single fields of work.MethodsTo construct a new index, operating figures of female and male medical students were collected for Germany in a period over 15 years and their progression throughout their studies towards specialization and academic chair positions. By the use of different female to male ratios (f:m), we constructed an index that describes the extend by which women can ascent in their academic career by using the field of academic medicine as an example.ResultsA medical student f:m ratio of 1.54 (52,366 female vs. 34,010 male) was found for Germany in 2013. In 1998, this f:m ratio was 0.999. In the same year (2013), the OB/GYN hospital specialists’ f:m ratio was 1.566 (3347 female vs. 2137 male physicians) and 0.577 (516 female vs 894 male physicians) for ENT hospital specialists, respectively. The f:m ratios concerning chairs of OB/GYN and ENT were 0.105 and 0.1, respectively. Then an index was generated that incorporated these operating figures with the student f:m ratio as denominator and the chair f:m ratio as numerator while the hospital specialist f:m ratio served as a corrector in the numerator in order to adjust to the attraction of a given field to female physicians. As a result, the index was 0.044 for OB/GYN and 0.113 for ENT instead of ideally ~1 in a completely gender harmonized situation.ConclusionIn summary, a new index to describe female career advancement was established for academic medicine. By the use of this index, different academic and medical fields can now be compared to each other and future benchmarks could be proposed. Also, country differences may be examined using the proposed index and the success of specific funding programs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12995-017-0164-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gender Disparities in Academic Rank and Writing amongst Medical Faculty Members

“…A steady tenure track and an increased number of publications are vital for academic promotions, but our study depicts that female faculty members have significantly lesser publications than male members. The results are in alignment with studies done in other countries (Buckley et al, 2000;Brüggmann & Groneberg, 2017). In 2017, it was indicated that women are less likely to become Professors in Cardiology (Carne & Merz, 2017).…”

Computer vision syndrome and ergonomic practices among undergraduate university students

“…This was not studied in our study and may be an opportunity for future research. Females were the majority in our study and this has been the status for several years in medicine in the western world, they also are more likely to use electronic devices to study compared with males …”

Gender influences in Digital Humanities co-authorship networks

“…Moreover, in the academic environment, female scholars encounter many more difficulties than their male counterparts and this may enhance their appreciation of positive collaborative networks. Numerous studies of female scholars have shown that they have less support, face greater professional isolation and slower rates of promotion, and are more likely to leave the academia before gaining tenure than their male counterparts (Wasburn, 2007; Baker, 2010; Brüggmann and Groneberg, 2017; Oleschuk, 2020). In order to overcome these challenges, some female scholars develop exceptional communication skills and make good use of their extensive connections.…”