An individual participant meta‐analysis of mirabegron in multiple sclerosis and spinal cord injury

Abstract

IntroductionOur objective was to conduct an individual patient data meta‐analysis (IPDMA) of the two published randomized placebo‐controlled trials of mirabegron in people with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) due to spinal cord injury (SCI) or multiple sclerosis (MS).MethodsWe identified two randomized, placebo‐controlled trials. We extracted individual patient data from the trials and evaluated two primary outcomes: change in maximum cystometric capacity and change in the patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC). We also evaluated several secondary outcomes related to urodynamic function and quality of life. We conducted three exploratory analyses to test hypotheses based on our clinical experiences with mirabegron in NLUTD. Analysis of covariance with adjustment for baseline values was used for the statistical analysis.ResultsOur IPDMA included 98 patients from the two trials. The results showed that mirabegron was associated with a significant improvement in maximum cystometric capacity (+41 mL, p = 0.04) and in the PPBC (−0.8, p < 0.01) compared to placebo. Secondary outcomes including peak neurogenic detrusor overactivity pressure (−20 cm H2O, p < 0.01), incontinence‐QOL score (+12, p < 0.01), and 24 h pad weights (−79 g, p = 0.04) also improved significantly compared to placebo. Exploratory analyses found similar improvements in people with MS and SCI; some outcomes improved to a greater degree among people with incomplete SCI, or SCIs that were below T7.ConclusionsOur IPDMA provides evidence supporting the use of mirabegron in patients with NLUTD due to SCI or MS. Further work evaluating differential responses in people with different SCI lesion characteristics may be warranted.