2014
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inexpensive, temporally integrated system for monitoring occurrence and biological effects of aquatic contaminants in the field

Abstract: Assessment of potential risks of complex contaminant mixtures in the environment requires integrated chemical and biological approaches. In support of the US Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, the US Environmental Protection Agency lab in Duluth, MN, is developing these types of methods for assessing possible risks of aquatic contaminants in near-shore Great Lakes (USA) sites. One component involves an exposure system for caged fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) adults suitable for the wide range of habitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two cages with 12 fathead minnows per cage (6 males and 6 females) were deployed at multiple locations in the Great Lakes basin (18 sites spanning 5 watersheds: St. Louis River estuary [MN, USA], Detroit River [MI, USA], Maumee River [OH, USA], Milwaukee River estuary [WI, USA], and Fox River [WI, USA]; Supplemental Data, Table S1) . These sites are characterized by a range of biological impairments associated with point and nonpoint contamination and designated by Environment Canada and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as Great Lakes areas of concern .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two cages with 12 fathead minnows per cage (6 males and 6 females) were deployed at multiple locations in the Great Lakes basin (18 sites spanning 5 watersheds: St. Louis River estuary [MN, USA], Detroit River [MI, USA], Maumee River [OH, USA], Milwaukee River estuary [WI, USA], and Fox River [WI, USA]; Supplemental Data, Table S1) . These sites are characterized by a range of biological impairments associated with point and nonpoint contamination and designated by Environment Canada and the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as Great Lakes areas of concern .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven day composite water samples were collected weekly from each treatment during the 21-d exposure, and also from control water during the last week of the onsite acclimation period. Every 20 min, autosamplers (see Kahl et al [10]) pumped a 28-mL sample into a 20-L, 5-mil Norton R MPTFE Film bag (Welch Fluorocarbon), yielding a 14-L composite sample over 7-d. After each 7-d collection period, the sample bags for each treatment were exchanged to collect a series of 3, 7-d composite samples over the course of the 21-d test. A 3-L aliquot was removed and shipped on ice overnight to the US Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Quality Laboratory (Denver, CO) for analysis of organic chemicals.…”
Section: Water Collection and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemicals that act as estrogen receptor (ER) agonists are frequently detected in WWTP effluents and receiving waters [6][7][8][9][10], and typically include endogenous ER agonists (e.g., 17b-estradiol [E2] and estrone) and exogenous estrogens (e.g., 17a-ethinylestradiol [EE2], bisphenol A [BPA]), alkylphenols, and plant-derived phytoestrogens [8,9,[11][12][13][14][15]. Feminization of male fish has been linked to ER agonist exposure, as indicated by changes in different types of biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Site 3 is also positioned near a WWTP discharge, in this case discharging approximately 130 million gal/d into the Maumee River, a tributary of Lake Erie (OH, USA; 41.6888°N, 83.47740°W). Composite (4 d) water samples were collected using methods described in Kahl et al . Samples were split, with 1 portion submitted for analytical chemistry analysis (see Supplemental Data, Table S1 for complete list) and the other portion extracted and reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide, a carrier compatible with the high‐throughput toxicity testing platforms employed by the ToxCast and Tox21 programs.…”
Section: Moving Toward the Next Frontiermentioning
confidence: 99%