2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2003.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An infinite family of cubic edge- but not vertex-transitive graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Z * pq ∼ = Z * p ×Z * q , there are eight elements of order 3 in Z * pq . Among these elements of order 3, four elements are the identity in Z * p or Z * q and the other four elements are of order 3 in both Z * p and Z * q , which can be easily proved by equation (2) in the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [33]. Thus, one may show that there are exactly four elements of order 3 satisfying the equation x 2 +x+1 = 0 in the ring Z pq .…”
Section: Proposition 26 a Cubic Cayley Graph X On A Dihedral Group mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since Z * pq ∼ = Z * p ×Z * q , there are eight elements of order 3 in Z * pq . Among these elements of order 3, four elements are the identity in Z * p or Z * q and the other four elements are of order 3 in both Z * p and Z * q , which can be easily proved by equation (2) in the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [33]. Thus, one may show that there are exactly four elements of order 3 satisfying the equation x 2 +x+1 = 0 in the ring Z pq .…”
Section: Proposition 26 a Cubic Cayley Graph X On A Dihedral Group mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this case there are two solutions r, s ∈ Z Z * n of the equation x 2 + x + 1 = 0 such that r = s, s −1 . Then, letting a = 1, b = − r , c = s, and d = − rs, the corresponding regular N -cover of K 3,3 is semisymmetric with vertex stabilisers isomorphic to Z Z 3 (see [30]). Hence the Goldschmidt type is G 1 .…”
Section: Families Of Cubic Semisymmetric Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Eq. (2) in the proof of Lemma 3.1 in[25], |(u i + Q) ∩ (v j + T )| = 1 for 1 i 2 s−1 , j = 1, 2. Let λ ij ∈ (u i + Q) ∩ (v j + T ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%