2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An influence of cyclic loading on the form of constitutive relationship for DP500 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, in terms of the steels characterized by initial cyclic hardening and subsequent softening (304, 18,19 316L, 20 DP500, 21 AISI 1045, 22 and AISI 321 23 steel), their strengths would be greatly enhanced during prior cycling because of dynamic strain aging or austenite/martensite transformation. Hence, determining the optimal pre‐cycling lifetime fraction corresponding to the highest remnant strength and revealing corresponding strengthening mechanisms are crucial for structural material design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in terms of the steels characterized by initial cyclic hardening and subsequent softening (304, 18,19 316L, 20 DP500, 21 AISI 1045, 22 and AISI 321 23 steel), their strengths would be greatly enhanced during prior cycling because of dynamic strain aging or austenite/martensite transformation. Hence, determining the optimal pre‐cycling lifetime fraction corresponding to the highest remnant strength and revealing corresponding strengthening mechanisms are crucial for structural material design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is significant to evaluate the effect of prior fatigue loading on remnant tensile and creep properties to ensure the safety of high temperature components. Previous works have revealed that the material tensile and creep properties could be altered by prior LCF loading [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, the studies about the influence of prior C-F loading on subsequent tensile and creep properties are still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubio et al [8][9][10][11] investigated the effect of prior LCF loading on subsequent tensile behavior of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy and AISI 4140T steel and found that the tensile deformation of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy kept relatively stable despite the prior LCF was introduced, while the prior LCF significantly reduced the tensile strength of AISI 4140T steel. Mocko et al [12][13][14] found that the yield stress and ultimate stress of DP500 steel could be increased by stress-controlled prior LCF loading and he also proposed a constitutive model to predict the uniaxial tensile behavior after LCF loading [15,16]. Shankar et al [17][18][19] further pointed out that both LCF and C-F loading degraded the tensile strength of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel and the increase of temperature led to additional decline of tensile properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, respectively. Ratcheting is commonly attributed to local deformation around voids, non-metallic precipitations and other defects within the material [94][95][96].…”
Section: Strain-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%