2016
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Information Criterion for Inferring Coupling of Distributed Dynamical Systems

Abstract: The behavior of many real-world phenomena can be modeled by non-linear dynamical systems whereby a latent system state is observed through a filter. We are interested in interacting subsystems of this form, which we model by a set of coupled maps as a synchronous update graph dynamical system. Specifically, we study the structure learning problem for spatially distributed dynamical systems coupled via a directed acyclic graph. Unlike established structure learning procedures that find locally maximum posterior… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tracing such advances is especially important because different champion teams usually employ different approaches, often achieving a high degree of specialisation in a sub-field of AI, for example, automated hierarchical planning developed by WrightEagle [23,24,26,21,28], opponent modelling studied by HELIOS [27], and human-based evolutionary computation adopted by Gliders [11,12]. Many more research areas are likely to contribute towards improving the League, and several general research directions are recognised as particularly promising: nature-inspired collective intelligence [29,30,31], embodied intelligence [32,33,34,35], information theory of distributed cognitive systems [36,37,38,39,40,41], guided self-organisation [42,43,44], and deep learning [45,46,47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracing such advances is especially important because different champion teams usually employ different approaches, often achieving a high degree of specialisation in a sub-field of AI, for example, automated hierarchical planning developed by WrightEagle [23,24,26,21,28], opponent modelling studied by HELIOS [27], and human-based evolutionary computation adopted by Gliders [11,12]. Many more research areas are likely to contribute towards improving the League, and several general research directions are recognised as particularly promising: nature-inspired collective intelligence [29,30,31], embodied intelligence [32,33,34,35], information theory of distributed cognitive systems [36,37,38,39,40,41], guided self-organisation [42,43,44], and deep learning [45,46,47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directed information-theoretic measures, such as transfer entropy [39], are particularly suited to this task in real systems in either the time-averaged or local forms [40]. These quantities have been used previously to infer interaction networks in multi-agent systems [41] and are particularly suited to processes with attracting states [42,43]. This would allow us to study contact networks in terms of both structural and functional connectivity [44,45,46,47] and their dominant motifs [48,49,50].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the algorithms presented in these papers can infer driving subsystems in a spatially distributed dynamical system, the results obtained differ from ours as inference is not considered for an entire network structure, nor is a formal derivation presented. Contrasting this, we recently derived an information criterion for learning the structure of distributed dynamical systems [ 12 ]. However, the criterion proposed required parametric modelling of the probability distributions, and thus a detailed understanding of the physical phenomena being studied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We represent such a spatially distributed system as a probabilistic graphical model termed a synchronous graph dynamical system (GDS) [ 11 , 12 ], whose structure is given by a DAG. Model selection in this context is the problem of inferring directed relationships between hidden variables from an observed dataset, also known as structure learning .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%