1982
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290030069012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Information Processing Model for Schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
93
0
6

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
11
93
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest the role of a limited-capacity, single-channel attentional resource in semantic priming effects, as emphasized by Henik et al The larger impact of intramodal (versus cross-modal) distractors is noted as inconsistent with Callaway and Naghdi's (1982) hypothesis of a general modality alternation effect in information processing. Callaway and Naghdi (1982) have hypothesized that schizophrenic participants may be more easily distracted when the signal to be ignored is presented in a sensory mode differing from the signal to be attended to. In addition, the observation of this secondary task 0distractor effect, even at a short SOA (100 ms) suggests to Henik et al that perhaps even spreading activation may require mental resources.…”
Section: Evidence For Impaired Controlled/ Attentional Information Prmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest the role of a limited-capacity, single-channel attentional resource in semantic priming effects, as emphasized by Henik et al The larger impact of intramodal (versus cross-modal) distractors is noted as inconsistent with Callaway and Naghdi's (1982) hypothesis of a general modality alternation effect in information processing. Callaway and Naghdi (1982) have hypothesized that schizophrenic participants may be more easily distracted when the signal to be ignored is presented in a sensory mode differing from the signal to be attended to. In addition, the observation of this secondary task 0distractor effect, even at a short SOA (100 ms) suggests to Henik et al that perhaps even spreading activation may require mental resources.…”
Section: Evidence For Impaired Controlled/ Attentional Information Prmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This model has played a major role in the study of semantic priming, as per the preceding section (see Callaway & Naghdi, 1982;Carr et al, 1979;Dawson & Nuechterlein, 1984;Schiffrin & Schneider, 1984;Schneider & Schiffrin, 1977 for general discussions of automatic versus controlled cognitive processes). We will employ this model in examining the results of semantic priming studies published to date.…”
Section: Semantic Priming Effects In Schizophrenia In the Context Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if anything, patients showed enhanced RIF. Whether this is an example of a disease-related abnormality of heightened automaticity is unknown (Callaway & Naghdi, 1982). Alternatively, the theory underlying RIF presupposes that repeated retrieval of a given item strengthens that item while simultaneously causing the loss of retrieval access to other related items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Frith model of schizophrenia (Frith, 1987(Frith, , 1992 places the main emphasis on the disturbance of automatic processes as responsible for the failure of patients in making a conscious distinction between their own actions and those performed by others. In fact, there is evidence that automatic processes, such as implicit memory, priming etc., are usually left intact in schizophrenic patients (Callaway and Naghdi, 1982;Gras-Vincendon et al, 1994), whereas conscious cognitive processes (explicit memory, action planning) are known to be more severely affected (e.g. Gray et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%