2015 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2015.7454364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inherently void avoidance routing protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a group of pressure-based and soft-state routing protocols like VAPR [5], IVAR [36], OVAR [20,37], and LLSR [38], which can keep the packets away from the void and trapped nodes during the packet forwarding by using the reachability information such as hop count distance and forwarding direction. However, they are not as scalable as a stateless approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also a group of pressure-based and soft-state routing protocols like VAPR [5], IVAR [36], OVAR [20,37], and LLSR [38], which can keep the packets away from the void and trapped nodes during the packet forwarding by using the reachability information such as hop count distance and forwarding direction. However, they are not as scalable as a stateless approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routing efficiency is certainly increased if the trapped nodes are also exempted from the packet forwarding. Although there are some soft-state approaches like VAPR [5], IVAR [36], and OVAR [20] which can bypass the trapped nodes by using the reachability information from the sink nodes, they are not scalable as a stateless approach. Our proposed routing protocol is, to the best of our knowledge, the first stateless routing protocol which is also able to bypass the trapped nodes.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a group of pressure-based and soft-state routing protocols like VAPR [4], IVAR [5], and OVAR [6], [7] which can keep the packets away from the void and trapped nodes during the packet forwarding by using the reachability information such as hop count distance and forwarding direction. However, they are not as scalable as a stateless approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another pressure beacon based routing protocol, named an Inherently Void Avoidance Routing (IVAR) Protocol for UWSNs, has been proposed to handle the communication void problem [11]. This protocol does not require full location information as it uses local depth information and number of hops to the sink.…”
Section: Void-awarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Route cost calculation: as discussed previously, an efficient cost calculation has a direct impact on selecting the best node among neighbors [11,15]. Therefore, convenient route cost should be carefully designed using suitable metrics such as depth, link quality, and residual energy, which in turn improve the network lifetime and reduce network overhead.…”
Section: Future Issues In Next Forwarding Node Selection In Uwsnsmentioning
confidence: 99%