2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1607.05874
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Innovations Algorithm for the prediction of functional linear processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there are major differences to the multivariate prediction case. Due to the infinite dimensionality of function spaces, Xf n+1,k in (3.1) is not guaranteed to have a representation in terms of its past values and operators in L, see for instance Proposition 2.2 in Bosq [5] and the discussion in Section 3 of Klepsch and Klüppelberg [13]. A typical remedy in FDA is to resort to projections into principal directions and then to let the dimension d of the projection subspace grow to infinity.…”
Section: Linear Prediction In Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Note that there are major differences to the multivariate prediction case. Due to the infinite dimensionality of function spaces, Xf n+1,k in (3.1) is not guaranteed to have a representation in terms of its past values and operators in L, see for instance Proposition 2.2 in Bosq [5] and the discussion in Section 3 of Klepsch and Klüppelberg [13]. A typical remedy in FDA is to resort to projections into principal directions and then to let the dimension d of the projection subspace grow to infinity.…”
Section: Linear Prediction In Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, however, has to be done with care, especially if sample versions of the predictors in (3.1) are considered. Even at the population level, the rate at which d tends to infinity has to be calibrated scrupulously to ensure that the inversions of matrices occurring, for example, in the multivariate Innovations Algorithm are meaningful and well defined (see Theorem 5.3 of Klepsch and Klüppelberg [13]).…”
Section: Linear Prediction In Function Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations