2012
DOI: 10.1364/oe.20.027922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative and efficient method to control the shape of push-pull membrane deformable mirror

Abstract: Abstract:We carry out performance characterisation of a commercial push and pull deformable mirror with 48 actuators (Adaptica Srl). We present a detailed description of the system as well as a statistical approach on the identification of the mirror influence function. A new efficient control algorithm to induce the desired wavefront shape is also developed and comparison with other control algorithms present in literature has been made to prove the efficiency of the new approach. , 1999). 25. G. Brusa-Zapp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical predictions were validated with our experiment, performed using a deformable mirror to induce known aberrations in a spherical lens (0.1 NA) [16]. The wavelength of the experiment was λ 638 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The theoretical predictions were validated with our experiment, performed using a deformable mirror to induce known aberrations in a spherical lens (0.1 NA) [16]. The wavelength of the experiment was λ 638 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The vector u(k) ∈ R 48 will be called the control input. We identified M using the identification procedure explained in [30,31]. The total wavefront y(k), that is measured by the S-H WFS, is a sum of the wavefronts produced by the two DMs:…”
Section: Problem Description and Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of the ILC algorithm for correcting wavefront aberrations were first demonstrated in [15]. However, in [15] the ILC algorithm only penalizes the differences between the voltages of two consecutive control iterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in [15] the ILC algorithm only penalizes the differences between the voltages of two consecutive control iterations. Although this approach enables us to control the convergence rate of the ILC algorithm, in some situations the steady-state voltages can still saturate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%