2011
DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.571780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative approach to risk and quality assessment in the regulation of care services in Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years in developed countries, factors such as the decline of the family unit, ageing populations, innovations in healthcare technology, rising expectations of clients and the economic crisis have increased the demand for social care while simultaneously causing (financial) pressure on the delivery of social care services (Pavolini and Ranci, 2008;FEANTSA, 2016), in turn creating unrest among the parties in the social care process, including care recipients, care providers and audit bodies that regulate care provision (Asenova et al, 2011). In response, governments have introduced reforms to social care services, with the aim of diversifying provider markets, for example, allowing local authorities with responsibility for the provision of social care to purchase services from independent for-profit and not-for-profit firms, and giving service recipients more choice and thus more control over their care (Malley and Fernández, 2010).…”
Section: Hpo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years in developed countries, factors such as the decline of the family unit, ageing populations, innovations in healthcare technology, rising expectations of clients and the economic crisis have increased the demand for social care while simultaneously causing (financial) pressure on the delivery of social care services (Pavolini and Ranci, 2008;FEANTSA, 2016), in turn creating unrest among the parties in the social care process, including care recipients, care providers and audit bodies that regulate care provision (Asenova et al, 2011). In response, governments have introduced reforms to social care services, with the aim of diversifying provider markets, for example, allowing local authorities with responsibility for the provision of social care to purchase services from independent for-profit and not-for-profit firms, and giving service recipients more choice and thus more control over their care (Malley and Fernández, 2010).…”
Section: Hpo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework was developed to identify the contributions of the care service itself, of non-service-related factors such as the personal circumstances of the individuals involved (including material, psychological, social and cultural influences), and of resource inputs (such as buildings, human resources and transport) on the outcome state of recipients of the social care services. Asenova et al (2011) specifically looked at how the Scottish Government's social care regulator, the Care Commission, was pursuing continual improvement in the quality of social care services using separate measures of risk and quality, and concluded that this system had important advantages but that the Commission should seek to minimize misunderstanding and conflict between regulators and regulatees on the closely interrelated matters of risk, quality and efficiency. Aas et al (2016) looked at the characteristics that drive successful innovation processes in public organizations providing care services, and found that employee participation and involvement has to be an integral part of these processes.…”
Section: Hpo Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a gap in transformation studies of critical and complex service systems. Extensive research has been focused on risks in the production sector, while far fewer studies have investigated the transition to risk-free services (Asenova et al 2011). Socio-ecological, socio-economic, and socio-technical transformation (Bechtold et al 2017;Hietala and Geysmans 2020; Jean-Jules and Vicente 2020) is essential to produce a systematic change towards the concept of sustainable service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%