2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01167.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative concept map approach for improving students' learning performance with an instant feedback mechanism

Abstract: Concept maps have been widely employed for helping students organise their knowledge as well as evaluating their knowledge structures in a wide range of subject matters. Although researchers have recognised concept maps as being an important educational tool, past experiences have also revealed the difficulty of evaluating the correctness of a concept map. It usually takes days or weeks for teachers to manually evaluate the concept maps developed by students; consequently, the students cannot receive timely fe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
64
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, despite the recommendations, none of these previous studies have involved students in developing their own peer-assessment criteria; instead, they merely asked the students to assess their peers' work based on the criteria provided by the teachers (Segrist & Schoonaert, 2006;Yu & Wu, 2013). Another problem encountered in most peer-assessment activities is that teachers are usually unable to provide instant comments or feedback owing to the lack of effective tools or strategies (Denton, Madden, Roberts, & Rowe, 2008;Wu, Hwang, Milrad, Ke, & Huang, 2012). Students are M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 likely to feel frustrated and lose interest during the learning process if their learning difficulties cannot be resolved immediately (Chu, Hwang, & Tsai, 2010;Hwang, Wu, & Ke, 2011).…”
Section: Peer Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, to the best of our knowledge, despite the recommendations, none of these previous studies have involved students in developing their own peer-assessment criteria; instead, they merely asked the students to assess their peers' work based on the criteria provided by the teachers (Segrist & Schoonaert, 2006;Yu & Wu, 2013). Another problem encountered in most peer-assessment activities is that teachers are usually unable to provide instant comments or feedback owing to the lack of effective tools or strategies (Denton, Madden, Roberts, & Rowe, 2008;Wu, Hwang, Milrad, Ke, & Huang, 2012). Students are M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 likely to feel frustrated and lose interest during the learning process if their learning difficulties cannot be resolved immediately (Chu, Hwang, & Tsai, 2010;Hwang, Wu, & Ke, 2011).…”
Section: Peer Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Section B of the questionnaire was developed to elicit information on the students' attitudes towards the proposed learning approach. The students were given 15 statements, which were adapted from the works of Rabie (2007), Mohamed and Omar (2008), Karakuyu (2010), and Wu et al (2012). The questions represented two attitude constructs: attitude towards learning and usefulness.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jēdzienu karšu formatīvajā vērtēšanā var izmantot kā paņēmienu, kurā e-vidē izstrādāto jēdzienu karti salīdzina ar iepriekš sagatavotu references karti (Berlanga, Rosmalen, Boshuizen, & Sloep, 2012;Wu, Hwang, Milrad, Ke, & Huang, 2011). Pēc salīdzināšanas automātiski tiek norādītas trūkstošās saites un sniegti komentāri.…”
Section: Formatīvā Vērtēšana Digitāli Izpratnes Veidošanai Un Pašvadīunclassified
“…Po-hans Vu (Po-han Wu) un līdzautori (Wu et al, 2011) izveidojuši digitālās formatīvās vērtēšanas sistēmu, kurā jēdzienu kartes tiek vērtētas un atgriezeniskā saite tiek sniegta izstrādātāja kartē norāžu vai saišu veidā. Savukārt Marija Kordaki (Maria Kordaki) (Kordaki, 2015) izveidojusi jēdzienu karšu viedo analizēšanas rīku, kas ļauj diagnosticēt un palīdz novērst kartē iekļautos skolēnu nepareizos priekšstatus.…”
Section: Formatīvā Vērtēšana Digitāli Izpratnes Veidošanai Un Pašvadīunclassified