2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An innovative prognostic risk assessment tool for manufacturing sector based on the management of the human, organizational and technical/technological factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To be more specific, the consequence severity of a risk factor can be measured by the number of people affected, the amount of cargo damaged, the time of transportation delayed, the property of the system loosed, the area of operation affected, and other negative impacts (ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) 2003; Wan et al 2019a). As the guidance of risk assessment, the definition has been widely used in many industries such as environmental system (Bereskie et al 2017), metropolitan construction projects (Kuo and Lu 2013), manufacturing sector (Djapan et al 2019), oil and gas offshore (Lavasani et al 2011;Baladeh, Cheraghi, and Khakzad 2019), municipal infrastructure (Shahata and Zayed 2016). Since the P and S will be defined by using fuzzy sets, R will also be presented by fuzzy numbers according to the Eq.…”
Section: Step 2 Application Of Fst With a Belief Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be more specific, the consequence severity of a risk factor can be measured by the number of people affected, the amount of cargo damaged, the time of transportation delayed, the property of the system loosed, the area of operation affected, and other negative impacts (ABS (American Bureau of Shipping) 2003; Wan et al 2019a). As the guidance of risk assessment, the definition has been widely used in many industries such as environmental system (Bereskie et al 2017), metropolitan construction projects (Kuo and Lu 2013), manufacturing sector (Djapan et al 2019), oil and gas offshore (Lavasani et al 2011;Baladeh, Cheraghi, and Khakzad 2019), municipal infrastructure (Shahata and Zayed 2016). Since the P and S will be defined by using fuzzy sets, R will also be presented by fuzzy numbers according to the Eq.…”
Section: Step 2 Application Of Fst With a Belief Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessment step includes the identification of the critical risks along with the assessment of the identified risks in terms of their calculated magnitudes (Djapan et al, 2018;Hatami-Marbini et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2016). Based on the concept of common risk matrix, the likelihood and intensity of each risk needs to be calculated, and subsequently they need to be multiplied by each other to give us the final magnitude .…”
Section: Background To Risk Assessment Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stage has already been addressed in one of the author's previous publications [5]. The approach presented and application of the results were different, but a similar method was applied.…”
Section: Hazards' Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xuecai & Deyong introduced a new method to assess and manage human factors [27]. A new procedure called Human Factor Risk Management (HFRM) was developed in [2] by Bevilacqua & Ciarapica or an innovative prognostic risk assessment tool for the manufacturing sector based on the management of the human, organizational and technical/technological factors in [5] by Djapan et al Risk assessment is also used to detect the hazards associated with dangerous workplaces in aviation, reported in [1] or [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%