An Insidious Poison or a Door to the Story?

Boesman, J.L.J.; Gorp, Baldwin Van

doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1159920

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This might give them bargaining power when discussing ideas with colleagues. Finally, there may be a discrepancy between journalist's perceived influence of colleagues, as studied in this article, and the observed influence of colleagues, as seen in ethnographic newsroom studies (e.g., Boesman and Van Gorp 2016).…”

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…A somewhat surprising finding is the limited perceived influence of colleagues. This contrasts with studies that emphasize the role of work floor meetings on the framing process (e.g., Boesman and Van Gorp 2016). One explanation is that the stories about developing countries are often made far away from the newsroom, for example by freelancers and foreign correspondents.…”

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Second, colleagues in the newsroom may influence framing. Newspapers and magazines routinely hold meetings during which topics are presented and approaches discussed (Boesman and Van Gorp 2016). Moreover, individual journalists receive guidance from senior staff members to such an extent that their stories may be reframed in the final editing process (Tandoc 2015).…”

Section: Influences On the Research And Writing Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Thinking and Writing About Global Poverty

Vossen

Gorp

Schulpen³

2017

Journalism Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Influences On the Research And Writing Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Thinking and Writing About Global Poverty

Vossen

Gorp

Schulpen³

2017

Journalism Studies

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sin embargo, aunque esto podría aplicarse a cualquier contenido, la abrumadora mayoría de la investigación se ha concentrado en los informativos, y muchas veces respecto de asuntos políticos (D'Angelo & Kuypers, 2010, p. 1), lo que ha justificado la preferencia del término 'encuadre noticioso' [news framing]. En diálogo con otras teorías, como gatekeeping y agenda setting, el estudio del encuadre noticioso considera tanto el ejercicio de elaboración-activación de marcos, por parte de los periodistas, como sus potenciales efectos en la audiencia (Boesman & Van-Gorp, 2016;D'Angelo, 2018;Lecheler & De-Vreese, 2019;Reese, 2010).…”

Section: Encuadres Mediáticos/noticiososunclassified

Marcos genéricos en las portadas de la prensa chilena sobre el estallido social de 2019

Matus,

Vitores,

Ramírez Friderichsen

2024

Perspect comun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Una de las consecuencias más llamativas del estallido social de 2019 en Chile, desde el punto de vista de los estudios en comunicación, fue el cambio en la percepción y valoración de los medios, por parte de la ciudadanía. En dicho contexto, es interesante saber cómo los medios representaron aquel fenómeno político-social. Objetivo: Describir cómo la prensa chilena de cobertura nacional y metropolitana (El Mercurio, La Tercera, La Segunda, Las Últimas Noticias, La Cuarta, HoyxHoy y Publimetro) informó sobre el estallido social de 2019 en sus portadas, desde la perspectiva de sus encuadres noticiosos genéricos. Metodología: Se realizó un análisis de contenido multimodal, es decir, que interpretara simultáneamente los mensajes verbales e icónicos alusivos al estallido. Resultados: El marco más relevante en la cobertura fue el de conflicto, seguido por los de interés humano y atribución de responsabilidad. Mucho menos importante fue el frame de consecuencias económicas, mientras que el de moralidad solo tuvo un aporte marginal. Discusión: Dado el carácter interpretativo de este análisis, evaluamos también la presencia de dos eventuales nuevos marcos genéricos: la neutralidad, que tuvo una baja presencia, y la orientación, que resultó ser muy importante en uno de los diarios, y creemos que tiene potencial para el estudio de la prensa popular.

show abstract

Nothing but the Facts?

Boesman

Meijer

2018

Journalism Practice

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper seeks to understand how journalists deal with storytelling and truth-seeking in their daily news practice. While storytelling is usually studied through texts, we approached it from a practice perspective, combining data from three ethnographic studies in which 36 beat reporters and 13 journalistic storytelling experts were extensively interviewed. Because of the emphasis journalists place on "finding out the truth" in public discourses, it is tempting for academics to present them as naive truth-seekers. However, by means of an interpretative repertoire analysis of their "practice" discourses, we seek to enlarge the discursive space to talk about the supposed tension between story and reality. Although departing from the idea that all news making is storytelling, the interviewed journalists consider news making and storytelling as distinct-and sometimes opposing-practices. These professional practices serve as the framework around which five storytelling repertoires are organized. KEYWORDS news making; storytelling; truth; journalistic practices; news ethnography; interpretative repertoires Storytelling in journalism is seen as a way to make news more meaningful for audiences. At the same time, it is often presented as standing vis-à-vis journalists' truth-seeking mission. Maras (2013, 66, emphasis added), for instance, writes in his monograph on objectivity: "One the one hand, reporters provide facts. On the other hand, they are teachers and storytellers compelled to draw on frames to educate, persuade and entertain". This paper wants to go beyond the storytelling-versus-reality debate by exploring storytelling as journalistic practice (cf. Ahva 2017; Couldry 2004; Swidler 2001). It shifts the emphasis from the study of texts and/or its effects (as is the case with the majority of storytelling research, e.g. Emde, Klimmt, and Schluetz 2016; Yaros 2006) to the ethnographic study of people's doings and sayings (Couldry 2004). Although it's unquestioned and "embodied" nature is at the core of practices (Swidler 2001), we also feel at home with Ahva's (2017, 1527) emphasis on the reflexivity aspect of practice-"to avoid the idea that people would merely 'act out' practices". Therefore, we take journalists' reflections about their practices as seriously as their performances. More specifically, this paper aims to provide more insight into the dilemma's and paradoxes journalists face when actually making and developing news stories. Through an analysis of the interpretative repertoires used by news beat reporters and journalistic storytelling experts, we seek to explore the discursive space within which journalists talk

show abstract

An Insidious Poison or a Door to the Story?

Cited by 6 publications

References 34 publications

Thinking and Writing About Global Poverty

Thinking and Writing About Global Poverty

Marcos genéricos en las portadas de la prensa chilena sobre el estallido social de 2019

Nothing but the Facts?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About