“…In this subsection, WFS will be compared with 11 similar classical global optimization algorithms, such as: Genetic Algorithm (GA) [34], Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [6], Bat Algorithm (BA) [58], Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) [33], Butterfly Optimization Algorithm (BOA) [1], Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) [32], Moth Flame Optimization (MFO) [31], Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) [14], Monarch Butterfly Optimization (MBO) [53], Moth Search (MS) [51], Elephant Herding Optimization (EHO) [52], LSHADE-cnEpSin (later denoted as A1) [3], LSHADE-SPACMA (later denoted as A2) [35] and EBOwithCMAR (later denoted as A3) [22]. It is worth pointing out that last three algorithms performed the best at the recent competition based on CEC 2017 benchmark for global optimization [37]. The choice of algorithms included in the computational study is mainly driven by the availability of code, whether the code was accessible online, or was it provided to us upon request by the courtesy of authors.…”